Prescience Expo has the few guidelines for reviewers to publish the Quality content. Papers receive to Prescience Expo are subjected to double blinded peer review process in which the reviewer and the author remain unknown to each other. Prescience Expo trusts that, thorough peer review process is an essential factor to yield huge quality works to be published in the journal.
Reviewer Guidelines
Standards to be considered by peer reviewers in the course of Article evaluation
The study would have innovation and should present the results of original research. It is required that the stated results are not published elsewhere.
The content of the manuscript has to meet the required publication standards.
Reviewer’s assignments during peer review
- Your viewpoint about quality of the article and provide the extent of the article to be improved.
- Summary the strengths and weaknesses of the Article.
- If the article really need for changes or should reject in your prospect, please clarify the grounds on which the conclusion is posed.
- Reviewers are requested to avoid any personalised declarations that may be considered as biased.
- Should maintain the confidentiality throughout the peer review process.
- Prior publication of the paper should never make use of any confidential information from the content.
- After publication only reviewers are allowed to use the published data. But not the content that they have gained from earlier drafts during peer review process.
Information apart from the published content can be used only after acquiring permission from the author.
Requested to perform the peer review with confirmed standardization and fairness. To complete the peer review analysis within the required time period.
Prescience Expo trusts the genuine peer review process that the reviewers carry out so that it helps us to publish the content with good essence.